vip scam

Are you being scammed?

by Don Kinney:

Inspections versus requalifications

There is some misunderstanding when it comes to high pressure cylinders and inspections versus requalifications. Those in the SCUBA dive industry are told that their cylinders must be inspected on an annual basis. Other high pressure cylinder users; such as fire departments, laboratories, aviation and beverage, rely solely on the 5-year requalification process. In either circumstance the more frequently you inspect the cylinder the less likely an unsuspecting issue will develop. The SCUBA industry has practical reasons for the annual inspections. Other industries have legal reasons for the 5-year re-qualification process. No matter which standard or regulations you follow, how would a cylinder owner know that the inspection was completed or the requalification completed properly and by a registered requalification facility? The owners/users only see a stamp, label or sticker. How does the owner/user know if they have paid for a service which may have never been performed? Or worse, paid for a service performed by an unauthorized facility.

Your facility

With regard to annual inspection stickers on a SCUBA cylinder, the trust may have to come from a relationship with a specific facility. There is no governing body which distributes specific stickers and/or tracks them in a system. Individuals can make their own sticker or purchase them from a plethora of commercial printers or facilities. The specific relationship with a facility will hopefully alleviate some doubt as to the inspection performed or the quality of that inspection. The close relationship may also act as a deterrent to the facility not to make a mistake on a valued client’s cylinders, or try to use short cuts.

Hydrostatic requalifiers work differently. Licensed hydro-testers must complete federally approved training and they must register with the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), a division of the Department of Transportation (DOT) in the United States. Other countries also have strict regulations to become a hydrostatic requalifier and maintain that qualification. Once a business becomes a government licensed hydro-test facility, they must follow the regulations or face fines and penalties for errors or mistakes.

RIN

In the United States a licensed facility is provided a Requalifier Identification Number (RIN). The RIN has one letter and three numbers, and is specific to each facility (see example below). If the facility is in compliance with the regulations the government maintains a record of active RIN holders. If the facility has problems, complaints, or is not in compliance, the government may impose fines or revoke the RIN.

hydro test

If the RIN is not valid, how is the user to know? The answer is easy. The DOT maintains a list of active RIN holders on their website: https://portal.phmsa.dot.gov/rinlocator . This locator will help you to determine if the facility you use for requalifications is current and valid. If you have any questions about the facility the link gives you the ability to send a query to the DOT asking specific questions.

Credentials

The below picture is an example of a facility or person who was not authorized to requalify a cylinder. If you look at the stamp you’ll see it does not meet the requirements listed in the above example. If you were to try and type in this RIN (GE81) it would not come up as valid on the DOT website. However, the owner paid this facility for a requalification, and unbeknownst to them, the cylinder most likely was never tested. That left the owner, and anyone else who may have used or filled that cylinder, exposed to hazards.

vip cylinder

Any time you use a facility to requalify your equipment, ensure that they have the proper documentation and credentials. If they are not valid, it is likely that they won’t be around to take the brunt of any legal actions and will likely not help in paying for a requalification. The simple step of verifying the facility could save you hundreds, or even thousands of dollars, depending on the number of high pressure cylinders requiring requalification.


– Don Kinney

Don Kinney is the owner of Cylinder Training Services. He started commercially working with cylinders in 1991. With his background in public safety he continued to gain knowledge in the field of high pressure cylinders and began to develop training programs. He has developed cylinder training programs for the fire service, diving, beverage, aviation and hydrostatic requalifier’s. His latest program qualifies persons to use Eddy Current instruments and is endorsed by AIT. Visit www.cylindertrainingservices.com for more information on courses and a full line of inspection equipment.

Related Blog Articles

PSD-night-operations
2 replies
  1. Stuart
    Stuart says:

    I used to O2 service cylinders and valves. One day a guy came into the shop and asked for 230 bar 100% O2 fills in 2 7 litre cylinders. We used to run an O2 booster pump and we were the only place to get high pressure O2 fills. I said yes and he said, well I am just picking them up from an O2 service from another dive operator and will be back in an hour. The other dive operators O2 servicing was about £10.00 cheaper than ours. He turns up hands over the cylinders and I am almost immediately suspicious. It has all the nice new O2 clean dive operator decals stuck on the cylinder but the valves are caked in lime scale. I drain the air from both, pop the valves out and take them apart. They were absolutely filthy inside. Black residue everywhere. There was no way the valves or cylinders has “just been O2 cleaned/serviced”. I was absolutely astonished. Not only had this organisation taken this guys money but they had done nothing but put a sticker on his cylinders. Worse still the amount of filth in the valves an cylinders represented an unacceptable risk to the person undertaking a high pressure O2 fill. Needless to say, action was taken!

    Reply
  2. Bob
    Bob says:

    Good article on hydro testing, and a good follow-up article would be one on exactly what the federal government requires for visual testing of aluminum (pre and post 1988 tanks) and steel tanks. I have found dive shops often blame that whatever they want to do with your tanks on the feds. For example, one (now out of business) shop in my Northern Virginia area told me that the federal government required a VIP eddy current test of my PST steel 120 annually. I don’t think an eddy current test even works on a steel tank, much less being required annually. In fact (correct me if I am wrong), I don’t think the feds even require a VIP on pre-1988 Luxfer tanks annually.

    Obviously, an article like this, if truly informative, could be controversial among dive shop owners. As private businesses, they can establish whatever policies they want. Many shops establish some age date (e.g., pre-1989) beyond which they will not fill an aluminum, or even steel tank. They can do that, but good ethical business practices require that the shop should state that this is THEIR policy, not a “government regulation,” thereby implying that every other dive ship must do the same.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*